
In other words, even though density of primes thins out, natural numbers are such that the largest prime factors of two consecutive natural numbers are almost equally likely to greater of less than one another. What was important for me here was that we were looking at a decimal representation of primes, since we wanted to find 100 sequential numbers. In fact,we have: u ( 10000) 5008, l ( 10000) 4991. 91 is not a prime so we can remove it from this list Every two different prime numbers are relatively prime. A: Let p be a prime number other than 2 and 3. Justify that every prime number except 2 and 3 has the form 6q + 1 or 6q + 5 for some integer q.

To cover off on Numbers ending with 1 just make sure the starting number ends with 0 and is a multiple of 11, 31, 41, 61, 71, 91, 101 where I have excluded 21, 51, 81 as they are divisible by 3. Solution for Prove that for any 9 consecutive natural numbers, there exists one number that is prime to the other 8 numbers. If it does not, simply multiply by 30 to get this.

No even number greater than 2 is prime because any such number can be expressed as the product. In the real world, primeless gaps of length $n$ tend to occur at yet lower magnitudes than these methods identify. Which natural numbers can be written as the sum of two or more consecutive integers The origin of this question is unknown to me, but one can easily believe. For example, $101!$ is on the order of $10^>1, 2\le i\le n$ since every $i$ will have some factor in common with both $n\#$ and itself. The $(n+1)!$ proof is very easy to understand, but it can create the impression that gaps of $100$ primeless numbers are almost impossibly rare.
